ReviewClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Longitudinal biomarkers in dementia with Lewy bodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative dementia. It is clinically and biologically heterogeneous, yet longitudinal biomarker studies assessing different aspects of neuropathological processes in DLB are scarce. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify biomarkers suitable for tracking disease progression in DLB and to evaluate potential outcome measures for clinical trials by examining which biomarkers show longitudinal changes correlating with clinical progression. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for longitudinal biomarker studies in DLB (sample size ≥10, follow-up duration ≥6 months). We conducted meta-analysis of three structural MRI-studies assessing whole-brain atrophy. Results: Of 9162 titles screened, 17 studies met selection criteria including ±460 patients with MCI-LB/DLB. 15 studies included imaging biomarkers (MRI, SPECT, PET) and two studies included fluid biomarkers (plasma, CSF). Except for DAT-SPECT, most studies addressed non-DLB specific neurodegeneration or Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Structural MRI-studies showed greater longitudinal atrophy in AD and mixed DLB + AD versus DLB and controls. Meta-analysis confirmed that DLB-patients were comparable to controls ( Conclusion: No single biomarker currently suffices to track disease progression in DLB. DAT-SPECT and FDG-PET showed promise, but further research is warranted on these and alternative, more disease-specific, accessible and feasible modalities to improve disease monitoring in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.