ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026
The Diagnostic Challenges of the Digitation Sign for Subscapularis Tears: Impact of Observer Expertise.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Challenges of the Digitation Sign for Subscapularis Tears: Impact of Observer Expertise.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate preoperative systematic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of subscapularis (SSC) lesions using the digitation sign by medical practitioners with various levels of experience. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent arthroscopy-assisted rotator cuff repair between April 2023 and September 2024. The inclusion criteria required preoperative 1.5 Tesla MRI scans with standardized protocols within 2 months of surgery. Patients were divided into SSC tears and intact groups based on intraoperative arthroscopic findings. Preoperative MRI images were independently evaluated by medical students, residents, orthopedic fellows, and attending doctors, blinded to arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of SSC tear detection were analyzed for each group. Arthroscopic findings were assessed in real time by the single surgeon and documented in the operative reports. Results: Out of 152 patients, 73 (48.0%) had arthroscopically confirmed SSC tears. Sensitivities for detecting SSC tears via the digitation sign were 57.5%, 72.6%, 80.8%, and 82.1%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in medical students (57.5%) and residents (72.6%) ( Conclusions: The digitation sign is a valuable tool for SSC tear detection but has limitations. These findings highlight the need for enhanced observer training and a cautious approach to interpreting the digitation sign in isolation. Combining multiple imaging findings and contextual clinical information is essential for reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.