ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2026
Real-World Evaluation of Guideline-Directed Treatments in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Germany.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is defined by left ventricular hypertrophy with outflow tract obstruction. Despite clear guideline-directed medical therapy recommendations from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), it remains unclear whether real-world treatment aligns with these guidelines. This study evaluates adherence to ESC guidance in Germany, focusing on pharmacological and invasive therapies and identifying gaps in real-world care for patients with obstructive HCM. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the WIG2 Benchmark database, containing administrative claims data from German statutory health insurers. Patients aged ≥18 years who received an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded diagnosis of HCM between 2012 and 2018 were included. Treatment alignment was assessed against ESC guidelines on HCM. Results: Of 6793 patients with an HCM diagnosis, 1141 had obstructive HCM. Mean age was 59.7 years and 62% were male. Following initial HCM consultation, 18% received beta-blocker (BB) monotherapy and 12% received calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy, in accordance with ESC guidelines. However, 43% of treatment combinations were not aligned with the ESC guidelines, including use of contraindicated dihydropyridine CCBs and vasodilating BBs, and 22% of patients did not receive any HCM-related pharmacological treatment. Overall, only 57% of the prescribed treatments were consistent with ESC guidelines for obstructive HCM management. Conclusions: This study reveals substantial gaps in alignment with the ESC guidelines for obstructive HCM management in Germany, underscoring the need for enhanced clinician education on existing therapies. Greater uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy is critical to improving patient well-being, functional status and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.