Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42383099›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2026

Real-World Evaluation of Guideline-Directed Treatments in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Germany.

Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani, Carla Zema, Michael Schultze, Tarcyane Barata Garcia, Nils Kossack, Ervant J Maksabedian Hernandez, Tobias Bluhmki, Taryn Krause, Johanna Schmoelders, Benjamin Meder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Farbod Sedaghat-HamedaniInstitute for Cardiomyopathies and Center for Cardiogenetics, Department of Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-0527
Carla ZemaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Michael SchultzeZEG - Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Tarcyane Barata GarciaWIG2 GmbH - Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils KossackWIG2 GmbH - Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Ervant J Maksabedian HernandezBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Tobias BluhmkiBristol Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany.
Taryn KrauseBristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.
Johanna SchmoeldersBristol Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin MederInstitute for Cardiomyopathies and Center for Cardiogenetics, Department of Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is defined by left ventricular hypertrophy with outflow tract obstruction. Despite clear guideline-directed medical therapy recommendations from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), it remains unclear whether real-world treatment aligns with these guidelines. This study evaluates adherence to ESC guidance in Germany, focusing on pharmacological and invasive therapies and identifying gaps in real-world care for patients with obstructive HCM. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the WIG2 Benchmark database, containing administrative claims data from German statutory health insurers. Patients aged ≥18 years who received an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded diagnosis of HCM between 2012 and 2018 were included. Treatment alignment was assessed against ESC guidelines on HCM. Results: Of 6793 patients with an HCM diagnosis, 1141 had obstructive HCM. Mean age was 59.7 years and 62% were male. Following initial HCM consultation, 18% received beta-blocker (BB) monotherapy and 12% received calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy, in accordance with ESC guidelines. However, 43% of treatment combinations were not aligned with the ESC guidelines, including use of contraindicated dihydropyridine CCBs and vasodilating BBs, and 22% of patients did not receive any HCM-related pharmacological treatment. Overall, only 57% of the prescribed treatments were consistent with ESC guidelines for obstructive HCM management. Conclusions: This study reveals substantial gaps in alignment with the ESC guidelines for obstructive HCM management in Germany, underscoring the need for enhanced clinician education on existing therapies. Greater uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy is critical to improving patient well-being, functional status and outcomes.

Indexed as

European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelinesleft ventricular outflow tract obstructionobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathypharmacological treatmentunmet need

Identifiers

PMID42383099
PMCPMC13315285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.