ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Construction and application of a diagnostic model for tuberculosis in patients with pneumoconiosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based model for diagnosing the presence of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with pneumoconiosis, utilizing complex clinical data to support early identification and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective case-control study analyzed the risk of TB among patients with pneumoconiosis using data extracted from electronic medical records. A total of 325 patients with occupational pneumoconiosis who were admitted to Beijing Chest Hospital, Shilong Hospital, and Fuxing Hospital between January 2019 and June 2024 were included. Participants were classified into a case group (pneumoconiosis with TB) and a control group (pneumoconiosis without TB). Diagnostic variables included demographic characteristics, occupational exposure history, medical history, laboratory parameters, etiological indicators, and imaging features. The study outcome was the occurrence of TB. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for concomitant pulmonary TB. Based on the selected variables, eight machine learning models were developed to construct diagnostic algorithms. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The best-performing model was further interpreted using the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) framework. Results: Regression analysis identified ten key diagnostic factors associated with TB in pneumoconiosis patients: etiological type, serum albumin, PaO Conclusion: Patients with pneumoconiosis are at a high risk of developing TB. Machine learning models can effectively aid in identifying TB in this population, with the RF model showing superior diagnostic performance. This approach may facilitate early auxiliary diagnosis and timely clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.