ArticleFrontiers in neurology
The referral-to-attendance gap in vestibular rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study in diverse South Florida patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite strong evidence for vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT), the proportion of referred patients who actually attend remains poorly characterized. This study quantified the VRT referral-to-attendance gap in a South Florida cohort and evaluated whether sociodemographic and insurance-related factors were associated with treatment uptake and clinical outcomes measured by the Dizziness Handicap Index (DHI) and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 243 adults aged 18-80 (observed range 25-79) who were recommended VRT at the University of Miami Ear Institute between 2012 and 2022. Demographic information (age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status), vestibular diagnoses, and outcome measures were extracted. Functional outcomes were assessed with baseline and follow-up DHI and FGA scores. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status was characterized using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Disparities in VRT attendance and outcomes were evaluated using Chi-square tests, Firth's penalized logistic regression, and analysis of covariance. Results: Of 243 patients referred for VRT, only 41% ( Conclusion: No measured sociodemographic or clinical variable explained non-attendance, suggesting that structural or logistical barriers may be the primary drivers of this gap. Neighborhood deprivation and insurance category were associated with clinically meaningful DHI improvement in exploratory analyses, but these findings are constrained by a small, racially homogeneous analytic sample and require confirmation in larger prospective studies with standardized outcome collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.