Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382975›Full record

ArticleAntibody therapeutics2026

Cytotoxic activity and safety characterization of IMV-M™, a MUC16 × DR5 bispecific antibody.

Victor S Goldmacher, Iosif M Gershteyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor S GoldmacherResearch and Development Department, ImmuVia, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-4436
Iosif M GershteynResearch and Development Department, ImmuVia, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: IMV-M is a MUC16 × DR5 bispecific antibody that has demonstrated MUC16-selective antitumor activity. However, it remained unclear whether multisite binding to MUC16 is required for cytotoxicity, and whether circulating CA125 (soluble MUC16) or antidrug antibodies could affect efficacy or cause toxicity. Methods: A comparative analysis of three bispecific antibodies, IMV-M (sofituzumab × DR5), 11D10 × DR5, and fluor × DR5, sharing an identical IgG1-anti-DR5 scFv architecture, was performed. Sofituzumab binds to multiple epitopes on a single MUC16 molecule, whereas 11D10 binds a single MUC16 epitope, and fluor does not bind any human antigen. Antibody binding to shed and cell-surface MUC16 was evaluated by ELISA and flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity was assessed in a MUC16 Results: IMV-M bound MUC16 to a markedly higher extent than the 11D10 × DR5 comparator, consistent with its multivalent engagement, while binding of fluor × DR5 to MUC16 was negligible. Only IMV-M induced potent cytotoxicity in MUC16 Conclusions: These findings suggest that IMV-M cytotoxic activity requires clustering on MUC16, that CA125 at clinically relevant concentrations does not mediate IMV-M neutralization, and that aggregate formation with secondary antibodies or soluble MUC16 does not induce off-target toxicity.

Indexed as

apoptosisbispecific antibodydeath receptor 5IMV-MMUC16

Identifiers

PMID42382975
PMCPMC13317741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.