ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periodic Health Examination: Screening for Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) are acutely or chronically painful conditions that cause limitations in mobility, dexterity, and participation in society. They are a major contributor to years lived with disability worldwide and their burden is higher in countries with a lower sociodemographic index, like the Philippines. The goal of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to provide recommendations to primary care providers on screening for MSDs among asymptomatic, apparently healthy children and adults. Methods: Following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to CPG development recommended in the Department of Health Manual, the evidence of net benefit or harm of screening for nine musculoskeletal conditions and risk factors was obtained through systematic literature search. Information on costeffectiveness, patient values and preferences, acceptability, feasibility of screening, and its impact on equity were also obtained. The final recommendations were formulated through consensus by a panel of representatives from multiple stakeholder groups. Results: There were 15 recommendations formulated. Strong recommendations were given to screen for physical inactivity among adults, fall risks and sarcopenia for adults aged ≥60 years old, and osteoporosis among women aged ≥65 years old. However, strong recommendations were made against screening for low vitamin D among infants, children, and adults, and against screening for osteoporosis among men and among women aged <65 years old. Conclusion: Through a comprehensive evaluation of the best available evidence using the GRADE approach, the Task Force developed 15 recommendations on screening and risk factor assessment for nine MSDs. These recommendations will serve as guidance on screening for MSDs at the primary care level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.