Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periodic Health Examination: Screening for Congenital and Developmental Disorders.

Background and Objective: Congenital and developmental disorders should be detected early to avoid complications such as disability and death. The Philippine clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide healthcare professionals on screening for congenital and developmental disorders among apparently healthy neonates and children. Methods: Following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to CPG development recommended by the Department of Health (DOH), the steering committee, composed of clinical geneticists, developmental pediatricians, family and community medicine physicians, and ambulatory and community pediatricians, set the objectives of the CPG and formulated clinical questions in consultation with stakeholders. There were 15 priority guideline questions that covered various disorders including inborn errors of metabolism, critical congenital heart disease, developmental delay, learning disabilities, and autism. Evidence review experts systematically reviewed existing clinical practice guidelines, appraised, and summarized the evidence. A multisectoral panel formulated recommendations through a formal consensus based on the evidence summaries. The CPG was externally reviewed prior to publication. Results: The CPG provides twenty (20) recommendations on fifteen (15) prioritized questions in the screening for certain congenital and developmental disorders. This CPG contains recommendations for the screening for critical congenital heart disease, thalassemia, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, developmental delay, and autism spectrum disorder. Recommendations against routine screening of cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, methionine adenosyltransferase deficiency, tyrosinemia, long chain 3-hydroxy acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCHADD) and mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency (MTPD), carnitine palmitoyl transferase types 1 and 2 (CPT1, CPT2) and glutaric aciduria type 2 (GA2), biotidinase deficiency, beta-ketothiolase deficiency, holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency, and isovaleric acidemia were made. Conclusion: The consensus panel recommended the screening of certain conditions, based on the available evidence, the burden of disease, the cost of the confirmatory testing, and its applicability to the population. Although this CPG intends to influence the direction of health policies for the general population, it should not be the sole basis for recreating or abolishing practices that aim to improve the health conditions of many Filipinos, particularly those part of the workforce.