Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382929›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2026

2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Periodic Health Examination.

Ian Theodore G Cabaluna, Maria Vanessa V Sulit, Myzelle Anne J Infantado-Alejandro, Howell Henrian G Bayona, Leonila F Dans, 2021 Philippine Periodic Health Examination Guideline Task Force

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian Theodore G CabalunaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Maria Vanessa V SulitInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Myzelle Anne J Infantado-AlejandroDe La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Cavite, Philippines.
Howell Henrian G BayonaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Leonila F DansDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
2021 Philippine Periodic Health Examination Guideline Task Force

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The first Philippine Guidelines on Periodic Health Examination (PHEX) provided evidence-based recommendations for prevention strategies in the Philippines, published in 2004. This 2021 clinical practice guideline (CPG) on PHEX aimed to update the previous PHEX recommendations to align with the implementation of the Universal Health Care Act. This CPG aimed to guide primary care providers, specialists, patients, and the general public and provide recommendations for safe, accessible, and cost-effective screening practices. Methods: We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including the GRADE Adolopment and Evidence-to-Decision framework (EtD). A multisectoral panel developed the recommendations by a formal consensus method upon evaluation of the evidence on benefits and harms, cost-effectiveness, patient values and preferences, acceptability, feasibility, and impact on equity. A conflicts of interest (COI) committee reviewed, evaluated, and managed the potential or declared conflicts of interest of this CPG's Task Force members. Results: The 2020 PHEX CPG had 23 recommendation statements. Strong recommendations were made to screen for the following conditions 1) Hypertension, 2) Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus using fasting blood sugar, 3) Adult obesity using Body Mass Index (BMI), 4) Unhealthy alcohol use in adults, 5) Tobacco smoking, 6) Colorectal cancer, and 7) Cervical cancer.Weak recommendations were developed to screen for the following: 1) Lipid disorder among adults with cardiovascular risk factors, 2) Type 2 DM using HBA1C, 3) Acute malnutrition in children, 4) Unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents, 5) High-risk sexual behavior, 6) Depression, and 7) Pulmonary Tuberculosis using chest X-ray.On the other hand, strong recommendations were also made AGAINST screening for the following: 1) Developmental delay using developmental screening tools, 2) Coronary artery disease using ECG, and 3) Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) using serum creatinine.Weak recommendations were also formulated AGAINST screening for the following: 1) Anemia using hemoglobin and/or hematocrit, 2) CKD using urinalysis, and 3) Lung cancer using chest X-ray. Conclusion: This guideline encourages adherence without restricting clinical judgment or patient-specific considerations. It also informs payers and policymakers without serving as the sole basis for financial or legal decisions. The strong recommendations in this CPG can be used as quality-of-care indicators when evaluating primary care programs. The recommendation statements will be updated at least every three years or as new evidence emerges.

Indexed as

guidelinesperiodic health examinationpreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID42382929
PMCPMC13316251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.