Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382915›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2026

Pregnancy options counseling in medical education and professionalism development.

Lucy D Brown, Carli A King, Leah J Peipert, Jeffrey F Peipert, Julianne Stout, Amy Caldwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucy D BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).
Carli A KingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).
Leah J PeipertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).
Jeffrey F PeipertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).
Julianne StoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).
Amy CaldwellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Brown, King, LJ Peipert, JF Peipert, Stout, and Caldwell).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent changes in both federal and state-level legislation have made accessing abortion care challenging, if not impossible, for some patients. As a result, patients' reliance on comprehensive, accurate pregnancy options counseling from trusted health providers has become critical to patient access and health equity. The current generation of medical students will play an increasingly important role in counseling patients on pregnancy options.

objectiveTo analyze the utility of a novel pregnancy options counseling curriculum by examining preclinical medical student perspectives on professional identity development as elicited by the curriculum. STUDY

designThis qualitative study investigated second-year medical students' perspectives on pregnancy options counseling after attending a virtual "Pregnancy Options Counseling Panel." The panel consisted of an interactive, case-based discussion of a patient diagnosed with an unintended pregnancy. After the panel, students submitted a prompt-driven reflection on professional identity development as it applies to pregnancy options counseling. The responses were coded using the AAMC Physician Competencies for Professionalism to identify themes and insights; competencies included "Physician Accountability," "Compassion, Integrity, Respect," "Patient Needs," "Patient Autonomy," "Sensitivity to Diverse Populations," and "Commitment to Ethical Principles." Coding was performed using the software Dedoose.

results348 student responses were included in this analysis. The most common codes applied were "Physician Accountability" (n=416), "Compassion, Integrity, Respect" (n=201), and "Patient Needs" (n=178). Inter-reviewer reliability tests showed significant agreement for all codes (k>0.63). The majority of student responses demonstrated accountability to patients while emphasizing the importance of compassionate, nonjudgmental care.

conclusionEducation on pregnancy options counseling is useful in professional identity development for medical students. The curriculum challenged students to reconcile their personal beliefs with their professional obligations, and most student responses were thoughtful and empathic. Pregnancy options counseling serves as an ideal vehicle for introducing value conflict as a measure of professionalism, while simultaneously improving students' medical knowledge on pregnancy termination and family planning.

Indexed as

abortionabortion referralmedical educationpregnancy options counselingprofessionalismreferral

Identifiers

PMID42382915
PMCPMC13314970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.