ReviewCureus2026
Regional Blocks in the Era of the Opioid Crisis: Evaluating Their Opioid-Sparing Effect.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative pain management strategies are increasingly shifting towards opioid-sparing approaches due to the ongoing opioid epidemic, with regional anaesthesia contributing significantly to multimodal analgesia. The purpose of this narrative review was to determine if the effect of regional anaesthesia on opioid consumption has been overestimated. Literature searches performed through PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar identified relevant studies that evaluated perioperative consumption of opioids, postoperative pain, and recovery profiles for neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. Current evidence demonstrates that regional anaesthesia significantly reduces opioid requirements and improves pain control in the immediate postoperative period, typically within the first 24-48 hours, while also decreasing opioid-related adverse effects such as postoperative nausea, sedation, and respiratory depression. However, most studies are limited to short-term outcomes, with insufficient evidence supporting sustained reductions in long-term opioid use or prevention of chronic pain. Furthermore, substantial heterogeneity in study design, surgical procedures, and concurrent use of multimodal analgesia complicates the isolation of regional anaesthesia's independent effect, potentially leading to overestimation of its true impact. Additional factors, including rebound pain, limited duration of single-shot blocks, and practical implementation constraints, may further attenuate its clinical benefit. While regional anaesthesia remains an important component of perioperative analgesia, its opioid-sparing effect appears to be context-dependent and best understood as part of a balanced, individualised multimodal approach rather than as a standalone solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.