Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382869›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Postpartum Uterine Dehiscence and Rupture Following Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Case Series.

Nika Bakshi, Gayaneh Nazarian, Stephanie Wong

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nika BakshiObstetrics and Gynecology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, USA.
Gayaneh NazarianObstetrics and Gynecology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, USA.
Stephanie WongObstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine rupture is a rare and potentially fatal complication seen after vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). We present two cases of uterine dehiscence and uterine rupture following successful VBAC, each demonstrating distinct clinical presentations and outcomes. A 34-year-old gravida 2, para 1001 developed persistent brisk bleeding after a successful VBAC, raising concern for uterine dehiscence. She was found to have a 2-cm anterior uterine defect that was successfully repaired. In contrast, a 31-year-old gravida 2, para 1001 developed hemodynamic instability following a successful VBAC and was found to have a 6-cm uterine rupture of the anterior wall, contiguous with a 4-cm posterior defect. The patient was started on a massive transfusion protocol and initially stabilized in the operating room; however, due to recurrent hemodynamic instability, an abdominal hysterectomy was performed. These cases highlight a rare yet serious complication of trial of labor after cesarean, with uterine dehiscence and rupture occurring at the prior hysterotomy site following successful VBAC. There is limited literature on the postpartum diagnosis of uterine rupture and dehiscence in the setting of VBAC; this report provides insight into their variable clinical presentations and management.

Indexed as

hemoperitoneumpostpartum hemorrhagetrial of labor after cesarean section(tolac)uterine dehiscenceuterine rupturevaginal birth after cesarean section

Identifiers

PMID42382869
PMCPMC13318384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.