Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382859›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2026

Technical note: A flexible framework for precision reduction of WRF inputs and outputs to balance storage efficiency and scientific fidelity.

Shang Wu, David C Wong, Jiandong Wang, Yuzhi Jin, Junjun Li, Chunsong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shang WuState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
David C WongApplied Science & Environmental Methods Division, Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Jiandong WangState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Yuzhi JinState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Junjun LiNational Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), 637616, Singapore.
Chunsong LuState Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, China Meteorological Administration Aerosol-Cloud and Precipitation Key Laboratory, and Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of data volumes from high-resolution regional climate simulations necessitates effective storage reduction strategies that do not compromise scientific integrity. Applying lossy precision reduction prior to lossless compression provides a promising approach. However, the distinct scientific implications of reducing precision in time-varying input forcings versus prognostic model outputs remain insufficiently quantified. Using a one-year Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulation, we systematically evaluate the storage benefits and downstream diagnostic impacts of retaining 5, 4, and 3 significant digits for both inputs and outputs. From a storage perspective, combining precision reduction (retaining 5-3 digits) with bzip2 compression reduces model outputs to 19.2 %-7.5 % of their original uncompressed sizes and model inputs to 52.4 %-18.5 %. Scientifically, precision-reduced inputs interact with nonlinear model dynamics and can induce spatial phase shifts in simulated meteorological systems. Although this process reduces deterministic grid-scale correspondence, the overall spatial morphology of the atmospheric structures remains largely preserved. Consequently, aggregate statistical distributions are weakly affected, especially during dynamically less active periods, rendering input precision reduction suitable for large-scale spatial aggregates and event-averaged statistical analyses. In contrast, output precision reduction acts as a static numerical filter whose impacts depend strongly on the intrinsic characteristics of individual variables. For example, regarding surface wind speed, retaining 3 significant digits still preserves an adequate error buffer. Cumulative variables, such as precipitation, progressively amplify quantization errors during temporal differencing and therefore require 4-5 significant digits to avoid artificial increments. Ultimately, this study constructs a flexible framework for WRF data compression. By dynamically tailoring precision to specific variable typologies and downstream scientific demands, the modeling community can substantially improve storage efficiency while rigorously safeguarding physical integrity.

Identifiers

PMID42382859
PMCPMC13316787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.