Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382848›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Deep reinforcement learning-based reversible medical image encryption framework for secure IoMT environments.

K Mahalakshmi, Sivakumar Nagarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K MahalakshmiDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sivakumar NagarajanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) environments face significant challenges in securely transmitting and storing medical images due to limited computational resources, multiple device types, and increasing cybersecurity threats. This paper describes a reversible RGB medical image encryption framework that employs deep reinforcement learning by combining adaptive policy learning with deterministic cryptographic algorithms. A Deep Q-Network (DQN) is used to dynamically select encryption actions based on statistical features extracted from the intermediate encrypted image state. To achieve strong security and precise image recovery, the framework employs a multi-layer reversible technique that comprises SHA-512-based keystream masking, Arnold scrambling with padding preservation, and chaotic diffusion. Extensive testing shows that this technique achieves high entropy, virtually optimum Number of Pixel Change Rate (NPCR) and Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI) metrics, minimal pixel correlation and near-zero Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) between the original and encrypted images, indicating a robust protection against statistical and differential attacks. Furthermore, the framework is robust against noise, data loss, occlusion, chosen plaintext, and determinism leaking attacks. Unlike fixed chaos-based encryption systems, the proposed framework introduces reinforcement learning-based adaptive action selection within a strictly reversible cryptographic pipeline. The effective key space exceeds 2

Indexed as

chaotic cryptographydeep reinforcement learningdeterministic encryptiondifferential attack resistanceInternet of Medical Things (IoMT)medical image encryptionreversible encryption

Identifiers

PMID42382848
PMCPMC13315033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.