ArticleJournal of bone oncology2026
ICG-based NIR fluorescence imaging can help to detect residual giant cell tumor of bone after intralesional curettage: Results of two-year follow-up.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Identification of clinical occult tumor residuals is crucial during giant cell tumor (GCT) intralesional curettage. This study investigated the capacity of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to detect tumor residual during intralesional curettage of GCT. Methods: Clinical data of 20 patients with GCT who received ICG near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence-assisted intralesional curettage with a minimal two-year follow-up in our institute were reviewed. Tumors were initially curetted under white light with naked eyes. Then, wounds were scanned to detect fluorescence residuals. Biopsies were conducted on the sites with fluorescence positivity or negativity. The fluorescence intensity (FI) of biopsied samples were determined using standardized process, and samples were sent for pathological examination. Results: All the tumors were successfully stained (100%). One patient (5%) experienced a local recurrence. The overall accuracy of ICG fluorescence in detecting tumor residuals (true positivity and true negativity) was 68%. The false positive rate and false negative rate were 38% and 21%, respectively. Fluorescence-positive samples showed a significantly higher rate of pathological positivity than negative samples ( Conclusion: ICG-based NIR fluorescence imaging can detect residual GCT after intralesional curettage, and can be used as a supplement to extended curettage to reduce recurrence. The FI is positively related to pathological results. However, false signals may occur. Efforts to increase accuracy and confirm its clinical benefits in preventing recurrence are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.