ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Long-term functional and radiological outcomes among survivors of ankylosing spondylitis-associated cervical spine fractures: a cross-sectional follow-up study.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are predisposed to unstable cervical spine fractures, often following low-energy trauma. While short-term outcomes have been described, long-term functional and radiological outcomes among survivors remain poorly characterized. Methods: Survivor cohort study with combined retrospective and prospective case identification and cross-sectional long-term follow-up, including patients with AS-associated cervical spine fractures treated at a single regional neurotrauma center between 2010 and 2020. Surviving patients underwent cross-sectional long-term follow-up including patient-reported outcomes, neurological and functional assessment, and cervical CT imaging. Primary outcomes included Neck Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scale for neck pain, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), Karnofsky Performance Status, living status, and CT-based fracture healing. Results: Among 144 patients with AS-associated cervical spine fractures, 102 were alive and eligible for follow-up; 97 completed assessments at a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Median Neck Disability Index was 16% (IQR 6-30). Most patients lived independently (80%), with median Karnofsky Performance Status 80 (IQR 70-90). Among patients with spinal cord injury, 50% recovered to AIS E and 71% improved by at least 1 AIS grade. Neck pain was generally mild (median Numeric Rating Scale 2), and CT demonstrated solid bony fusion in 96% of assessed cases. Conclusions: Among long-term survivors, neck-related disability and pain were generally low, independence was preserved in most patients, and fracture healing rates were high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.