ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Large Language Models for Ophthalmology Training in China: A Prospective Evaluation.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study explored large language models (LLMs) as a scalable solution to the global shortage and uneven distribution of ophthalmologists, particularly their actual effectiveness and potential risks in ophthalmic training. Design: This is a prospective study. Subjects: Eleven leading LLMs (ERNIE Bot 4.5 Turbo, Dou Bao, Tongyi Qianwen 3, DeepSeek-R1, ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Tencent Yuanbao T1, HuatuoGPT II, Baichuan4-Turbo, Kimi k1.5, GLM-4) and 10 resident physicians (RPs) from a tertiary ophthalmology hospital in China. Methods: Phase 1: all LLMs were tested on the Chinese and English versions of the Chinese National Health Professional Technical Qualification Examination (Intermediate Level) in Ophthalmology (CNHPTQE-O). Phase 2: the best-performing LLM was used to assist the 10 RPs in 2 tasks: (1) answering the same CNHPTQE-O text questions and (2) classifying 4 types of keratitis images. Resident physicians completed unassisted and assisted phases with a 1-month washout period. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were accuracy (%) on the CNHPTQE-O for LLMs, and change in accuracy for RPs with versus without LLM assistance (text and image tasks). The secondary outcomes included postassessment survey ratings and confusion matrix analysis. Results: Several Chinese LLMs, especially ERNIE Bot 4.5 Turbo, demonstrated superior performance on the CNHPTQE-O, achieving accuracies of 98.00% (Chinese) and 86.50% (English). ERNIE Bot 4.5 Turbo significantly outperformed all RPs on the Chinese examination ( Conclusions: Large language models possess a solid foundation in ophthalmic knowledge and can effectively enhance trainee performance in text-based assessments, demonstrating clear potential as a training aid. However, their limitations in image-assisted diagnostic tasks and the associated risk of "artificial ignorance" should not be overlooked. Financial Disclosures: The author has no/the authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.