ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Electroacupuncture as an eosinophil-targeting treatment in ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis involving β
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophils amplify type-2 (Th2) inflammation and tissue injury in allergic rhinitis (AR), and eosinophilic burden correlates with disease severity and future asthma risk. Current AR therapies have limitations, motivating interest in non-pharmacologic neuromodulatory approaches. Here, we tested whether electroacupuncture (EA) attenuates eosinophilic inflammation in AR and probed a candidate neuroimmune mechanism. Methods: Using an ovalbumin (OVA)-induced AR mouse model, we compared EA with the antihistamine chlorpheniramine (CLP). We assessed nasal behaviors, inflammatory biomarkers, and histological changes. Mechanistic exploration involved administering β Results: In OVA-challenged mice, EA significantly alleviated nasal rubbing, redness, and olfactory dysfunction, showing comparable efficacy to CLP. While OVA induction increased IL-5, IL-13, and serum OVA-specific IgE, both treatments significantly reduced these markers. Crucially, only EA reversed OVA-induced nasal eosinophil infiltration and suppressed RNASE2A expression; CLP primarily suppressed mast cell degranulation and MCPT1 expression. Mechanistically, pre-treatment with butoxamine-but not butaclamol-abolished the EA-mediated reduction of OVA-induced IL-5, IL-13, RNASE2A, and CCR4. Furthermore, EA was associated with elevated plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels. While butoxamine blocked EA-induced symptom relief and eosinophil reduction, intranasal epinephrine mimicked EA's beneficial effects on these parameters. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that EA reduces eosinophilic inflammation and AR behaviors associated with the activation of β
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.