ArticleJPRAS open2026
Autologous dermis reinforcement in severe rectus diastasis with cutaneous excess: A case report.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe rectus diastasis with ventral hernia is typically reinforced with synthetic mesh, although prosthetic materials carry risks of infection and other complications. Autologous dermis harvested during abdominoplasty offers a biologic alternative. We report the case of a 36-year-old multiparous woman with giant rectus diastasis (15 cm intraoperatively; 19 cm on computed tomography) and an umbilical hernia associated with marked skin excess. She underwent abdominoplasty with placement of an autologous dermal graft in a sublay position to reinforce fascial repair. One week postoperatively, umbilical necrosis required debridement and local-flap reconstruction; subsequent recovery was uneventful. At one year, no recurrence was detected clinically or by ultrasound, and the patient reported high functional and aesthetic satisfaction. This case demonstrates that autologous dermal reinforcement can provide durable abdominal wall support even in very large defects while avoiding prosthetic material. The absence of mesh was advantageous in the setting of umbilical necrosis, reducing the risk of mesh infection. Autologous dermis during abdominoplasty is therefore an efficient and cost-effective option for selected patients with severe rectus diastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.