Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382704›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2026

Challenges and complications in secondary rhytidectomies, a systematic review.

Charbel Saad, Ramza Ishak, Jean Paule Joumaa, Ibrahim Harb, Nancy Emmanuel, Gregory Nicolas, Juan Pablo Menendez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charbel SaadGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Ramza IshakGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon.
Jean Paule JoumaaFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon.
Ibrahim HarbFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nancy EmmanuelDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gregory NicolasDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juan Pablo MenendezDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The demand for secondary rhytidectomies is increasing. These procedures are technically more demanding than primary surgery due to postsurgical anatomical changes, presenting unique challenges and risks. The objective of this systematic review is to define these challenges, describe common surgical principles, and summarize the reported outcomes and complications of secondary rhytidectomies. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus using particular keywords. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, comparative studies, case series and case reports that reported the surgical outcomes of secondary rhytidectomies. Results: Fourteen articles were included in this systematic review, encompassing 737 patients. Presentation was approximately 9-12 years after primary surgery. The most consistent intraoperative finding was altered anatomy, including a thinner, more delicate superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), fibrosis, and scarred tissue planes. Reported complication rates in cohort studies ranged from 2.0 % to 21.1 %. The most common complications were hematoma and temporary facial nerve injury, with rates of the latter reaching as high as 11.9 % in some series. Other reported adverse events included seroma, minor skin slough, and delayed healing. Conclusions: A secondary rhytidectomy presents distinct intraoperative challenges stemming from altered anatomy. Despite this increased complexity, the existing literature suggests that overall complication rates are comparable to those of primary facelifts.

Indexed as

ComplicationFaceliftRhytidectomySecondary

Identifiers

PMID42382704
PMCPMC13316293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.