ReviewJPRAS open2026
Challenges and complications in secondary rhytidectomies, a systematic review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The demand for secondary rhytidectomies is increasing. These procedures are technically more demanding than primary surgery due to postsurgical anatomical changes, presenting unique challenges and risks. The objective of this systematic review is to define these challenges, describe common surgical principles, and summarize the reported outcomes and complications of secondary rhytidectomies. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus using particular keywords. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, comparative studies, case series and case reports that reported the surgical outcomes of secondary rhytidectomies. Results: Fourteen articles were included in this systematic review, encompassing 737 patients. Presentation was approximately 9-12 years after primary surgery. The most consistent intraoperative finding was altered anatomy, including a thinner, more delicate superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), fibrosis, and scarred tissue planes. Reported complication rates in cohort studies ranged from 2.0 % to 21.1 %. The most common complications were hematoma and temporary facial nerve injury, with rates of the latter reaching as high as 11.9 % in some series. Other reported adverse events included seroma, minor skin slough, and delayed healing. Conclusions: A secondary rhytidectomy presents distinct intraoperative challenges stemming from altered anatomy. Despite this increased complexity, the existing literature suggests that overall complication rates are comparable to those of primary facelifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.