ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
How organizational support promotes teacher professional recognition: a perspective on teachers' autonomous learning and teaching abilities.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teacher professional recognition is a key factor in promoting teacher professional development and improving educational quality. In reality, many teachers feel undervalued and lack the recognition and attention they deserve, and organizational support often remains superficial. Existing research has mostly focused on either organizational support or teacher competence in isolation, lacking a systematic exploration of their synergistic effects. This theoretical blind spot has limited the academic understanding of the mechanisms of teacher professional recognition and has led to school support measures that are not targeted enough to meet the real needs of teachers, potentially further weakening their sense of recognition and hindering the continuous improvement of educational quality. Methods: To fill this gap, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of 3,983 primary and secondary school teachers from different regions in China. Data analysis was performed using Mplus 8.0, SPSS 27.0, and Smart PLS 4.0 software. Results: Organizational support not only directly influences teacher professional recognition but also indirectly affects it through the parallel mediating roles of autonomous learning ability and teaching ability. Discussion: This mechanism integrates both organizational and individual levels, indicating that organizational support can directly impact professional recognition and revealing two specific mediating paths. The first is the autonomous learning ability path, where organizational support promotes teachers' active learning and reflection. The second is the teaching ability path, where organizational support enhances teachers' teaching design and enthusiasm. These multiple paths collectively drive the deepening of teacher professional recognition. Theoretically, this study clarifies the mechanism by which organizational support influences teacher professional recognition, expands the integrated framework of organizational support theory and self-determination theory, and enriches the existing theoretical knowledge system. Practically, the study suggests that schools should establish a comprehensive support system covering policies, leadership, and colleagues, implement differentiated support strategies, and innovate evaluation and incentive mechanisms to genuinely enhance the importance placed on teachers. Future research could adopt longitudinal or experimental designs, expand sample diversity and representativeness, and integrate qualitative evidence to enhance the validity and robustness of research results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.