ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceived stress related to the Russia-Ukraine war in nine Latin American countries.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Large-scale geopolitical crises may generate psychological distress beyond populations directly exposed to violence, particularly through uncertainty, perceived lack of control, and indirect exposure to threatening information. Objective: To determine the association between country of residence and perceived stress related to the Russia-Ukraine war among adults from nine Latin American countries. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted during March and April 2022. Perceived war-related stress was assessed using the validated nine-item War-Stress scale. Three binary outcomes were defined using the empirical upper tercile of the overall score and its two prespecified subcomponents: conflict-specific stress and external-factor stress. Adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust variance, controlling for sex, age, and educational level. Results: The final analytical sample included 2,463 participants. The most frequently endorsed stress-related item was concern that the conflict could escalate into a larger war, with 29.72% agreeing and 19.57% strongly agreeing. In adjusted analyses, Argentina showed a higher prevalence of overall high war-related stress compared with Colombia (aPR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.33-2.25; Conclusion: Perceived stress related to the Russia-Ukraine war varied across Latin American countries and was especially associated with external and anticipatory dimensions of the conflict. The findings support the relevance of studying indirect psychological responses to distant geopolitical crises in populations already exposed to broader social and post-pandemic vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.