ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mathematical metacognition and computational thinking in adolescents: the roles of cognitive flexibility and grade level.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computational thinking is a key higher-order cognitive skill in adolescence, extending beyond computer science to mathematical problem solving and complex reasoning. Although mathematical metacognition has been associated with computational thinking, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. Grounded in Flavell's metacognitive theory and Wing's framework, this study examines the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating role of grade level in this association among high school students. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 467 high school students (M Results: Mathematical metacognition was positively associated with computational thinking. Mediation analyses showed that cognitive flexibility partially mediated this relationship, indicating both direct and indirect associations between metacognitive regulation and computational thinking. In addition, the interaction between cognitive flexibility and grade level was significant, indicating that this association varied across grade levels. Simple slope analyses showed that the positive association between cognitive flexibility and computational thinking strengthened at higher grade levels. The index of moderated mediation was significant (IMM = 0.065, 95% CI [0.012, 0.141]), indicating that the indirect association varied systematically across grade levels. Conclusion: The findings suggest that cognitive flexibility may represent an important mechanism underlying the association between mathematical metacognition and computational thinking within a developmental framework. By demonstrating that this association becomes stronger across grade levels, the findings support the value of integrating metacognitive and flexibility-oriented practices in secondary education to promote computational thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.