ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Does project-based STEAM curriculum benefit 3-4-year-old preschoolers' creative potential? A pilot comparison with theme-based curriculum.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increasing attention given to project-based STEAM education in early childhood settings, empirical evidence regarding its effects on the creative potential of very young children remains limited, particularly in comparison with traditional theme-based curricula. This pilot study employed a 1-year quasi-experimental design to examine the differential impacts of these two curricular approaches on the creative potential of 3-4-year-old preschool children. Sixty-nine children from three first-year preschool classes participated in the study, with individual assessments conducted before and after the intervention. The results indicated that, although the experimental group initially scored lower than the control group, it demonstrated greater improvement in overall creative potential over time. Within-group analyses revealed significant or marginally significant increases in the experimental group across multiple dimensions, including flexibility, fluency, and originality. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant improvement and even exhibited a slight declining trend. Repeated-measures analyses further showed a significant Group × Time interaction for overall creative potential, indicating greater developmental gains in the experimental group. After controlling for baseline differences, the experimental group consistently demonstrated higher adjusted post-test means across all dimensions. Although these between-group differences did not reach statistical significance, moderate effect sizes suggested meaningful practical advantages. In addition, both groups exhibited increasing individual differences over time, with greater variability observed in the experimental group. Overall, the findings suggest that project-based STEAM curricula may offer advantages in promoting and sustaining early creative development compared with traditional theme-based approaches. This study provides preliminary empirical support for the implementation of project-based STEAM learning in early childhood education and highlights its potential role in fostering the development of creative potential during the early years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.