Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382611›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026

The FHJ debate: There is no evidence for the drive towards virtual wards.

Tim Cooksley, Kyaw Myat Thu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Decision making at the front door.Future healthcare journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim CooksleyAcute Medicine, The Christie and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Kyaw Myat ThuMedicine for Older People and Stroke Medicine, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual wards and hospital at home are rapidly growing models of care globally and in the UK. Evidence is growing around positive impact of specialist-led hospital at home care for frail, multimorbid patients in comparison to traditional hospital admission for treatment of certain medical conditions. However, the scope of practices under the term 'virtual wards' varies, resulting in unclear quantitative results. This themed article discusses differing viewpoints - are virtual wards inconsistent distractions during NHS crisis, or patient-centred innovations for future healthcare?

Indexed as

Evidence-based medicineHospital at HomePatient experienceScientific evidenceVirtual wards

Identifiers

PMID42382611
PMCPMC13316375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.