Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382595›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Semi-Quantitative Monitoring of Plant-Arthropod Interactions by eDNA Metabarcoding of Individual Flowers and Leaves.

Arndt Schmidt, Joanna Hank, Merve Tello, Michael Erik Grevé, Christian Ulrich Baden, Christian Maus, Henrik Krehenwinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arndt SchmidtDepartment of Biogeography University of Trier Trier Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7456-1064
Joanna HankDepartment of Biogeography University of Trier Trier Germany.
Merve TelloDepartment of Biogeography University of Trier Trier Germany.
Michael Erik GrevéBayer AG Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Christian Ulrich BadenBayer AG Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Christian MausBayer AG Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Henrik KrehenwinkelDepartment of Biogeography University of Trier Trier Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-8601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has revolutionized our ability to study plant-arthropod interaction diversity. However, the method has one main limitation: while it accurately recovers the presence of individual species, it has limited quantitative recording capabilities. Recent work suggests that this problem can be overcome by processing replicate eDNA samples at individual sites. The naive occupancy of a species within a replicate sample approximates its relative abundance or its interaction strength with the sampled matrix. However, this approach will lead to a significant increase in the necessary workload and costs, especially as the usually applied filtering of eDNA samples is laborious and expensive. Here, we explore the option to directly extract eDNA from individual leaves and flowers omitting a filtration step. We test different isolation protocols and compare the results with a conventional filtration-based protocol. We show that simple precipitation suffices to recover community-level eDNA of arthropods from individual flowers, significantly reducing costs and efforts. We then test our optimized protocol in two apple orchards in Germany, where we sample individual leaf and flower samples. Our protocol reliably recovers typical orchard-associated arthropod species across broad ecological guilds. The naive occupancy-based abundances of these species reflect the expected community composition in orchards very well. For comparative purposes, we also performed a conventional, quantitative bee monitoring in the orchards using window traps. Based on this monitoring, we show that replicate sampling of flowers is even a promising option to semi-quantitatively recover bee pollinators and their ecological interaction diversity from eDNA. Simplified replicate eDNA sampling will considerably improve our ability to characterize arthropod communities.

Indexed as

agricultureeDNAmetabarcodingpollinator

Identifiers

PMID42382595
PMCPMC13316126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.