Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382584›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Mechanisms of Movement Patterns: Physiology and Sex Influence Gopher Tortoise (

Karin Ebey, Michael Hilton, Jeffrey Goessling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karin EbeyEckerd College Natural Sciences Collegium St. Petersburg Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1688-1308
Michael HiltonEckerd College Natural Sciences Collegium St. Petersburg Florida USA.
Jeffrey GoesslingEckerd College Natural Sciences Collegium St. Petersburg Florida USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central topic in spatial ecology is identifying what determines animal movement patterns, including both exogenous and endogenous factors. Given that there are different sex-based selection pressures in mating and reproduction, movement patterns often vary between males and females in predictable manners; males of polygynous species typically move more than females to maximize mating opportunities. In female polygynous animals, selection is generally thought to favor movement patterns with smaller home ranges and high spatial site fidelity. Physiology may also constrain movement patterns in a way that can obscure sex-specific selection. We used GPS loggers and physiological assays to study Gopher Tortoise (

Indexed as

gopher tortoiseGPS loggermovement ecologyphysiological constraint

Identifiers

PMID42382584
PMCPMC13316722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.