ArticleProstate international2026
Seminal vesicle injury during radical prostatectomy does not affect the oncological outcome of prostate cancer patients.
Article in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Seminal vesicle invasion (SVI; stage T3b) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is associated with a worse prognosis compared to extraprostatic tumor extension (pT3a). For reasons remaining largely unknown, patients with stage T3b have a higher risk of progression, metastatic dissemination, and death from PCa than patients stage pT3a. The seminal vesicles (SVs) have been shown to provide a favorable microenvironment for tumor progression. During radical prostatectomy (RP), injury to the SV leads to leakage of SV fluid, providing a potential breeding ground for PCa cells. To our knowledge, the effect of intraoperative SV injury on the oncological outcome has not been investigated. Herein, we report on oncological outcome in patients with and without documented intraoperative SV injury. Materials and methods: A total of 1,139 consecutive PCa patients undergoing RP between 2005 and 2023 were included in this single-center study. The presence/absence of SV injury during RP was documented. SV injury was defined as any tear/incision of the SVs resulting in leakage of SV fluid. Clinical endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS; defined as biochemical recurrence-free survival) and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 1,086 (95.4%) patients received robotic-assisted RP. 4.6% of patients underwent open ( Conclusions: Intraoperative SV injury had no effect on the oncological outcome of PCa patients in our cohort; even when SVI, stage ≥ pT3a disease, and/or positive surgical margins were present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.