ArticleProstate international2026
Active surveillance could apply to one-quarter of Korean prostate cancer cases: Insights from a 27,075-patient cohort.
Article in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathologic profile of Filipino men with low-risk prostate cancer and predictors of unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Residential location shapes initial prostate cancer care in Korea (2010-2020): A nationwide stage- and risk-stratified study.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were to estimate an upper bound for the proportion of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer in Korea who could be managed with active surveillance (AS) when favorable intermediate-risk disease is included and to describe variation in AS eligibility by calendar year, administrative district, and residential setting. Materials and methods: We analyzed biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer diagnosed in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 across 51 general hospitals nationwide. Risk was classified using routinely collected clinicopathologic variables (prostate-specific antigen, clinical T stage, Gleason grade group, and biopsy core involvement); AS eligibility was defined as the union of low risk, potentially low risk, and favorable intermediate risk. Group differences in proportions were evaluated using χ Results: Among 27,075 men (37.9% of nationally reported cases in the indexed years), 1,476 (5.45%) were low risk, 1,082 (4.00%) potentially low risk, 4,028 (14.88%) favorable intermediate risk, 5,880 (21.72%) unfavorable intermediate risk, and 14,609 (53.94%) high risk. Overall, 6,586 (24.3%) were AS-eligible. By year, AS eligibility decreased from 27.6% (2010) to 22.0% (2020) ( Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of newly diagnosed men in Korea appear potentially eligible for AS under a maximized definition that includes favorable intermediate-risk disease. AS eligibility differed significantly by year, region, and residential setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.