Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382551›Full record

ArticleProstate international2026

Asia-Pacific collaborative consensus statements on water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm) incorporating a systematic review, a two-round Delphi survey, and a consensus meeting.

Brian Wai Hei Siu, Jeremy Man Hon Ho, Xeng Inn Fam, Yu-Chao Hsu, Min Gu Park, Jae Hyun Jung, Weida Lau, Adistra Satjakoesoemah, Teerapon Amornvesukit, Suntchai Wirotsaengthong and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Brian Wai Hei SiuSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jeremy Man Hon HoSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xeng Inn FamDepartment of Urology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
Yu-Chao HsuDepartment of Urology, Hong Ren Hospital, Taiwan.
Min Gu ParkFaculty of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Hyun JungSeoul Leaders Urology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
Weida LauDepartment of Urology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Adistra SatjakoesoemahAbdi Waluyo Hospital, Indonesia.
Teerapon AmornvesukitBumrungrad Hospital, Thailand.
Suntchai WirotsaengthongBNH Hospital, Thailand.
Angus Man Chung ChanSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Varat WoranisarakulSiriraj Hospital, Thailand.
Anand DharaskarManipal Hospital, Pune, India.
C MallikarjunaAsian Institute of Nephrology and Urology (AINU), India.
Chi Fai NgSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ka Lun LoSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) is a minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While its efficacy has been demonstrated, high-quality evidence concerning optimal patient selection and perioperative management is limited, leading to heterogeneous application. This is an Asia-Pacific (APAC) collaborative effort aiming to develop a consensus statement to standardize various aspects of WVTT therapy for clinical practice and to guide future research. Methods: The consensus statement was developed using a modified Delphi method, consistent with previous urological consensus statements. First, a systematic review was performed to identify areas of uncertainty across the entire WVTT clinical pathway. Next, 150 urologists from the Asia-Pacific region with experience in WVTT were invited to complete a two-round online Delphi survey. Finally, a 13-member consensus panel meeting (each with ≥50 cases of experience) was held to review, discuss, and re-vote on statements without prior consensus. 'Consensus agree' was pre-defined as follow: ≥70% of participants scoring a statement 7-9 and ≤15% scoring it 1-3 (on a 9-point Likert scale). Results: Based on the 'uncertainties' review of 197 studies, 92 statements were generated. Through two rounds of Delphi survey, consensus was reached on 74 statements. The consensus panel reached agreement on a further 10 out of 18 statements, resulting in 84 final statements. The statements provide guidance on six domains: case selection (e.g., feasibility in refractory retention and median lobes), preoperative preparation (e.g., management of antithrombotic medications), patient counseling, surgical procedure (e.g., anesthesia and injection strategies), postoperative management and follow-up (e.g., medication discontinuation), and data reporting and outcome measures. Conclusions: Using a modified Delphi method, this APAC collaborative consensus provides comprehensive recommendations to standardize and optimize the use of WVTT. It aims to serve as a critical reference for clinicians and inform future research until more robust, long-term comparative evidence becomes available.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaConsensusMinimally invasive surgical therapyRezumWater vapor thermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID42382551
PMCPMC13316396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.