ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
Auditory Efferent System Influencing the Auditory Overshoot Phenomenon: An Auditory Brainstem Response Study in Guinea Pigs.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Detection of a brief tonal signal at the beginning of a longer masking noise is difficult, but it becomes easier when the onset of the signal is delayed. This phenomenon is known as overshoot or temporal effect. Our study investigates the impact of the auditory efferent nerves (AENs) function on the auditory electrophysiological overshoot, further introducing an objective tool examining one of the AENs performances. Therefore, the effect and the trend of changes induced by low- and high-frequency stimuli on electrophysiological overshoot were studied in different delay onset times (DOTs) between the signal and the noise before and after dissecting the AENs. Methods: Right internal auditory canals were exposed in 16 young male guinea pigs weighing 250 to 350 g. The inferior and posterior vestibular nerves known to carry AENs were transected in half of the subjects. Then, the ABR waveforms were recorded at 16 and 8 kHz tone burst stimuli at 0, 30, 60, and 100 ms DOTs relative to wideband noise. The latency values of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I and III were compared among the different DOTs and 5 signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) before and after the surgery. Results: By increasing DOTs, ABR waves I and III latency decreased in the control group before and after the surgery and in the case group before surgery at 16 kHz. However, the observed overshoot-like effect disappeared after the surgery in the case group. The wave's latency I and III increased from 0 to 30 ms, remained approximately constant from 30 to 60 ms, and then decreased toward 100 ms DOTs. However, none of the measurements at 8 kHz before and after surgery in both groups showed an overshoot effect. Conclusion: Using the ABR paradigm, the overshoot phenomenon disappeared after the transection of AENs. The results confirmed the role of the efferent system in auditory overshooting. Therefore, an objective tool to measure auditory efferent function is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.