Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382514›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience

Effect of High-frequency Electrical Stimulation of Olfactory Bulb on Spontaneous Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells of Kindling Rats.

Parisa Zarei, Mohammad Reza Raoufy, Amir Shojaei, Yaghoub Fathollahi, Javad Mirnajafi-Zadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parisa ZareiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-0115
Mohammad Reza RaoufyDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-8564
Amir ShojaeiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-2851
Yaghoub FathollahiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-4805
Javad Mirnajafi-ZadehDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-9052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a new therapeutic method for the treatment of neurological disorders such as epilepsy. However, the precise procedure underlying the anticonvulsant action of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) has remained unclear. This study explores the effect of HFS applied to the olfactory bulb (OB) on seizure-induced changes in spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) in kindling animals. Methods: Male rats underwent a kindling procedure involving semi-rapid electrical stimulation (6 stimulations per day) of the hippocampal CA1 region. Fully kindled animals received HFS (at 130 Hz) at 5 min, 6 h, 24 h, and 30 h after the last kindling stimulation (kindled+HFS group). Subsequently, the impact of HFS on EPSCs was evaluated in CA1 pyramidal neurons of hippocampal slices from kindled subjects using the whole cell patch clamp technique. Results: In kindling animals, sEPSC amplitude increased (P<0.001), while the sEPSC inter-event interval decreased compared to the control group (P<0.05). Applying HFS in the OB of fully kindled animals resulted in a reduction in sEPSCs amplitude and an increase in the inter-event interval of sEPSCs. No significant differences between kindling and control groups were observed in membrane potential and input resistance. Notably, the application of HFS in kindling animals restored the observed changes, so no significant difference was observed in the measured parameters between the kindled+HFS and control groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the OB may be a viable target for DBS in epilepsy treatment. HFS application may mitigate a seizure-induced increase in sEPSCs occurrence.

Indexed as

Deep brain stimulation (DBS)EpilepsyHippocampusOlfactory bulb (OB)Seizure

Identifiers

PMID42382514
PMCPMC13318198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.