Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382493›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Analysis of Histopathological Lesions and Their Correlation With Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings: A Retrospective Study at a District Hospital in Ghana.

Prosper Adjei, Samuel Kyeremeh Adjei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Prosper AdjeiDepartment of Internal Medicine Methodist Hospital Wenchi Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1221-4667
Samuel Kyeremeh AdjeiDepartment of Internal Medicine Methodist Hospital Wenchi Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1985-2651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is a crucial diagnostic tool for evaluating lesions of the upper GI tract, its findings are not always definitive, necessitating histopathological confirmation. This retrospective study aimed to assess the spectrum of histopathological lesions and their correlation with endoscopic impressions at Methodist Hospital, Wenchi, Ghana. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy with biopsy between August 2024 and September 2025. Out of 513 patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy, 176 were biopsied, but 46 were excluded due to missing histopathology reports, leaving 130 patients for analysis. Endoscopic impressions were compared with histopathological diagnoses across different GI tract sites (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated with sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK). Results: Of the 130 patients, 97.7% of lesions were benign (predominantly chronic gastritis), and 2.3% were malignant. Endoscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 29.2-100) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI: 95.8-100) for malignant lesions. Cohen's Kappa was 0.796, indicating substantial agreement, while PABAK was 0.966, reflecting near-perfect concordance after adjusting for prevalence. Conclusion: Upper GI endoscopy showed high diagnostic accuracy and substantial concordance with histopathology for benign lesions such as gastritis. These findings suggest that clinicians in resource-deprived areas where histopathology is not readily available or may be associated with long turnaround times can safely commence targeted treatments for benign upper GI conditions based primarily on endoscopic findings.

Indexed as

BiopsyEndoscopyGhanaHistopathologyUpper Gastrointestinal

Identifiers

PMID42382493
PMCPMC13316800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.