Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382485›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Second-Look Ultrasonography for Evaluating BIRADS 3 and 4 Non Mass-Enhancement: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Elaheh Yaghoubvand, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Fahimeh Zeinalkhani, Nasrin Ahmadinejad, Mahshid Hamidi, Peyman Kamali Hakim, Hadise Zeinalkhani, Hamid Rajabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elaheh YaghoubvandDepartment of Breast Imaging Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-1644
Saeed MohammadzadehDepartment of Breast Imaging Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7759-3441
Fahimeh ZeinalkhaniDepartment of Breast Imaging Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-7759
Nasrin AhmadinejadDepartment of Breast Imaging Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0444-2538
Mahshid HamidiDepartment of Breast Imaging Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.
Peyman Kamali HakimRadiology Department Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9529-9081
Hadise ZeinalkhaniRadiology Department Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-963X
Hamid RajabiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Breast MRI is a highly sensitive imaging modality for assessing suspected breast lesions; nevertheless, its specificity is poor, ranging from 40% to 80% in various studies. Second-look ultrasound (SLUS) is a tool for the validation of MRI-identified breast abnormalities. This study aimed to assess the role of SLUS as a complementary method for evaluating suspicious non mass-enhancement (NME) on breast MRI. Methods: Fifty patients with 52 non-mass enhancing lesions, classified as BIRADS 3 or 4 on MRI by an expert breast radiologist, were rechecked by SLUS. The relationship between age, breast cancer history, MRI indication, imaging features, and BIRADS classification of the lesions with the sonographic detection rate and pathology findings was analyzed. Results: Out of 52 lesions, 23 were identified on SLUS, 21 patients referred to biopsy. Seven out of 21 biopsies had malignant pathologies. Age less than 40 years, pathological breast discharge, and BIRADS-MRI 4 had a positive relationship with the identification on SLUS. Five of 29 lesions that had no sonographic findings were referred to stereotactic biopsy due to suspicious findings on mammography, and four were malignant on pathology. The only variable that showed a significant relationship with the lesion malignancy was the BIRADS category on MRI. Conclusion: NMEs with BIRADS 4 on MRI were more detectable on SLUS than BIRADS-MRI 3. If detected, ultrasound could not downgrade the BIRADS category of the lesions or exempt them from biopsy.

Indexed as

breastMRInon‐mass enhancementsecond‐look ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42382485
PMCPMC13316823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.