Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382481›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026

An umbrella protocol for the clinical evaluation of diagnostics in infectious disease.

Edward Blandford, Sarah Tunkel, Elizabeth Coates, Carolina R Arevalo, Simon E Kolstoe, Obaghe Edeghere, Fiona Maleady-Crowe, David Chapman, Carolyn Lewis, Raghavendran Kulasegaran-Shylini and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Edward BlandfordUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Sarah TunkelUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Elizabeth CoatesUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Carolina R ArevaloUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Simon E KolstoeSchool of Health & Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, England.
Obaghe EdeghereUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Fiona Maleady-CroweUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
David ChapmanDeloitte MCS Ltd, London, England.
Carolyn LewisUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Raghavendran Kulasegaran-ShyliniUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Richard VipondUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Deborah A WilliamsonUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Richard PebodyUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Isabel OliverUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Susan HopkinsUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.
Sue HillNHS England and NHS Improvement, London, England.
Tom FowlerUK Health Security Agency, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4PU, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbrella protocols have recently come to be widely used in clinical trial designs. However, the value of this approach in public health is less well recognized. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the need for rapid, reliable and scalable evaluation of diagnostic technologies. In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, this need prompted the development of an umbrella research protocol enabling multiple clinical evaluation studies of similar designs to be undertaken under a single overarching preapproved ethics and governance framework. We describe the development, implementation and evolution of this protocol, which was designed to support timely assessment of the performance of in vitro diagnostic devices and associated testing approaches in various settings. The umbrella protocol allowed studies to be started quickly during the pandemic, reduced administrative burdens, supported regulatory submissions and enabled prospective collection of samples for surveillance. While the system described reflects British governance structures, the principles underpinning this approach, including proportionality (ensuring oversight requirements are appropriate to the risk level), standardization and preapproved flexibility, are applicable to many settings. The protocol now forms part of the United Kingdom's wider pandemic preparedness structure and illustrates how preapproved, adaptable research frameworks can accelerate evidence generation during outbreaks. The world is now assessing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and it is timely to consider how research systems can support innovative designs such as umbrella protocols. We therefore summarize lessons learnt and practical considerations to support other countries seeking to adopt similar approaches within their own ethical and regulatory systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19Research DesignHumansNorthern IrelandPandemic PreparednessPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42382481
PMCPMC13318375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.