ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026
A public-private partnership for facility-based tuberculosis screening using chest radiographs, Viet Nam.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A public-private partnership for facility-based tuberculosis screening using chest radiographs, Viet Nam.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine tuberculosis prevalence among health-care facility patients and to assess the effectiveness of chest radiography in facility-based tuberculosis screening. Methods: Our cross-sectional analysis used individual-level data collected during 2020-2023 from adults presenting at 796 health-care facilities participating in a public-private partnership in 15 provinces of Viet Nam. We constructed tuberculosis care cascades stratified by symptomatic presentation according to the World Health Organization (WHO) four-symptom screening and chest radiography. We reported diagnostic yield, number needed to screen and positivity. Findings: Among 1 423 818 participants, 22 598 had bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis. Diagnostic yields were 2.2% (19 289/892 894) among symptomatic individuals with cough, 1.0% (1869/191 677) among symptomatic individuals without cough and 0.4% (1440/339 247) among asymptomatic individuals. Tuberculosis-suggestive chest radiograph results compared with normal results increased bacteriologically confirmed positivity by 9.4 percentage points in symptomatic individuals with cough (17.3%; 18 746/108 650 versus 7.9%; 543/6851), by 4.6 percentage points in symptomatic individuals without cough (12.6%; 1748/13 831 versus 8.0%; 121/1515) and by 7.6 percentage points in asymptomatic individuals (15.0%; 1328/8862 versus 7.4%; 112/1511). Without chest radiography, the number of individuals requiring testing to detect tuberculosis among symptomatic individuals with cough and without a cough would have been 6.5 (1 084 571/165 679) and 5.4 (892 894/165 679) times higher, respectively. Conclusion: Chest radiograph screening can reduce the number of expensive molecular tests used in symptomatic patients and enable tuberculosis diagnosis in asymptomatic patients. Future research should analyse cost and cost-effectiveness of using chest radiography in active and intensified case finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.