ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026
Behaviour change intervention for inhaler disposal, Spain.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyse metered-dose inhaler disposal behaviour in asthma patients, determine the patient characteristics that contribute to appropriate disposal and quantify the effect of a pharmacy-led educational intervention. Methods: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study in 40 Spanish hospitals followed by a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation. We surveyed adults with uncontrolled severe asthma receiving biological therapy to determine sociodemographic, health, environmental attitude and disposal behaviour characteristics. At the time of biological therapy dispensation, we provided patients with an infographic on inhaler environmental impact and appropriate disposal. We resurveyed participants 3 months later to assess changes in knowledge, attitude and disposal behaviour. We identified factors associated with correct inhaler disposal and quantified the impact of the intervention using a multivariate logistic regression and McNemar test, respectively. Findings: Despite 86.7% (435/502) of our study participants valuing environmental conservation and 91.6% (460/502) being aware of medication disposal programmes, only 46.6% (234/502) correctly disposed of inhalers. Factors associated with appropriate disposal included practising household recycling, high perception of inhaler environmental impact, awareness of medication disposal programme, low income and self-reported limitations to daily activities. On resurveying patients 3 months after our pharmacy-led intervention, we observed an increase in correct inhaler disposal to 84.1% (418/497) with parallel gains in awareness and recycling behaviours. Conclusion: We revealed a discrepancy between the environmental concerns of asthma patients and inhaler disposal behaviour, due to limited knowledge of inhaler environmental impact. We demonstrated that this knowledge gap can be reduced, doubling the correct disposal of inhalers, through a targeted pharmacy-led intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.