SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Psychological variables of crossFit participants: an up-to-date systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CrossFit® presents a relevant context for investigating psychological variables due to its characteristics, including high-intensity training, a competitive environment, strong social interaction, and a focus on performance and overcoming physical and mental limits. This systematic review aimed to broaden understanding of the psychological variables of CrossFit participants by identifying findings, methodologies, and existing research gaps. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251120994). Searches were performed in SCOPUS, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of the included cross-sectional studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which employed a cross-sectional design. Exercise dependence was the most frequently investigated variable, with prevalence rates ranging from 14.4% to 25.2%. Intrinsic and self-determined motivation predominated among participants and were strongly associated with passion for the sport. Evidence also suggested positive effects on well-being and emotional self-efficacy. Conversely, competitive settings were associated with increased anxiety levels and negative mood changes. Preference and tolerance for high-intensity exercise were positively related to social support. Conclusion: The findings indicate that CrossFit participation is associated with high levels of intrinsic motivation, passion for the sport, and emotional self-efficacy, which may contribute to psychological well-being. However, the occurrence of exercise dependence, mood fluctuations, and elevated anxiety in competitive contexts highlights the importance of professional monitoring and appropriate training load management. Further research, particularly longitudinal and experimental studies, is needed to strengthen the evidence regarding the psychological outcomes associated with CrossFit participation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251120994, identifier CRD420251120994.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.