Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382434›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026

Understanding Patient Perspectives on Radiation Tattoos.

Bonnie Hu, Anurag Saraf, Andrew Johnson, Hope Heldreth, Idalid Franco, Brenda Lormil, Jason A Efstathiou, Florence K Keane, Ariel Hirsch, Rachel B Jimenez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bonnie HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anurag SarafHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew JohnsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hope HeldrethDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Idalid FrancoHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brenda LormilDepartment of Medicine, Henri and Belinda Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason A EfstathiouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Florence K KeaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ariel HirschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rachel B JimenezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The standard of care for patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) is to receive permanent, skin-based tattoos to assist with treatment alignment. Prior studies suggest that tattoos can generate emotional distress in patients with cancer, adding to the burden of cancer treatment and recovery. We surveyed patients who received tattoos for RT to understand their perspectives and attitudes toward tattoos. Methods and Materials: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients who previously received RT at either Massachusetts General Hospital or Boston Medical Center and returned for routine clinical follow-up between May and November 2021. They were asked to complete a 16-item survey that queried patients' understanding of the purpose of tattoos and the level of distress experienced from receiving tattoos. Results: Three hundred patients with radiation tattoos completed the survey. The median age was 68 years, 48% were women, and 81% were White; 39% and 46% were diagnosed with breast and genitourinary cancers, respectively. Overall, 20% of patients experienced distress from tattoos. Younger age (49% age <50 years vs 25% age 50-64 years vs 11% age ≥65 years) and not understanding the purpose of tattoos were independently associated with experiencing distress ( Conclusions: Receiving radiation tattoos is a source of distress for a sizable minority of patients receiving RT for cancer. Young patients and those lacking understanding of the purpose of tattoos were most likely to experience distress. Future interventions should address both patient education and the elimination of permanent tattoos for RT, as appropriate.

Identifiers

PMID42382434
PMCPMC13316444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.