ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Understanding Patient Perspectives on Radiation Tattoos.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The standard of care for patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) is to receive permanent, skin-based tattoos to assist with treatment alignment. Prior studies suggest that tattoos can generate emotional distress in patients with cancer, adding to the burden of cancer treatment and recovery. We surveyed patients who received tattoos for RT to understand their perspectives and attitudes toward tattoos. Methods and Materials: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients who previously received RT at either Massachusetts General Hospital or Boston Medical Center and returned for routine clinical follow-up between May and November 2021. They were asked to complete a 16-item survey that queried patients' understanding of the purpose of tattoos and the level of distress experienced from receiving tattoos. Results: Three hundred patients with radiation tattoos completed the survey. The median age was 68 years, 48% were women, and 81% were White; 39% and 46% were diagnosed with breast and genitourinary cancers, respectively. Overall, 20% of patients experienced distress from tattoos. Younger age (49% age <50 years vs 25% age 50-64 years vs 11% age ≥65 years) and not understanding the purpose of tattoos were independently associated with experiencing distress ( Conclusions: Receiving radiation tattoos is a source of distress for a sizable minority of patients receiving RT for cancer. Young patients and those lacking understanding of the purpose of tattoos were most likely to experience distress. Future interventions should address both patient education and the elimination of permanent tattoos for RT, as appropriate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.