ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Radiation Therapy Infrastructure, Social Vulnerability, and Insurance Architecture Predict Timely Postoperative Radiation Therapy After Brain Tumor Craniotomy.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Timely initiation of radiation therapy (RT) following craniotomy for malignant brain tumors is associated with better clinical outcomes. Despite guideline recommendations and best practices, the timely initiation of postoperative RT remains suboptimal. Our objective was to evaluate how structural, social, and payer-related factors independently and interactively influence RT initiation following craniotomy. Methods and Materials: We conducted a retrospective, patient-level cohort study using a large, linked, multisource data set that incorporated all-payer claims from 2023, geospatial hospital data, and indicators of community vulnerability. RT initiation was assessed at 42-, 60-, and 90-day postoperative intervals. Primary predictors included hospital referral region-level RT center density, hospital proximity, payer type, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) domains. Secondary analyses included region and hospital type. Results: Among 18,885 patients across 548 hospitals, 29.2% initiated RT ≤ 42 days, 45.6% ≤ 60 days, and 48.9% ≤ 90 days. Hospital-level RT initiation ≤42 days ranged from 0% to 87.5%. Hospital referral region per capita RT center density was the strongest structural predictor of RT initiation ≤42 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per IQR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25) and lower odds of noninitiation ≤90 days (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90). Hospital proximity predicted RT initiation ≤42 days (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17) but not ≤90 days. Medicaid coverage predicted lower odds of RT initiation ≤42 days (aOR, 0.58) and higher odds of noninitiation ≤90 days (aOR, 2.29); Medicare coverage predicted lower odds of timely initiation but not of noninitiation (aOR, 0.76). Higher community social vulnerability (Social Vulnerability Index), particularly the share of elderly residents, limited transportation, and housing cost burden, predicted noninitiation, with interaction models showing that hospital density mitigated, but did not eliminate, these disadvantages. Conclusions: Structural access, socioeconomic disadvantage, and insurance coverage independently and interactively predict the timely initiation of postoperative RT, with greater regional RT capacity improving initiation but not fully mitigating social and payer-related barriers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.