Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382396›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Artificial intelligence for biomarker prediction in gastric cancer: from histopathology to multimodal integration.

Yesul Jeong, Sangjeong Ahn, Sung Hak Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yesul JeongDepartment of Hospital Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangjeong AhnDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hak LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) exhibits substantial molecular heterogeneity, necessitating precision oncology approaches. Conventional biomarker assessments, including immunohistochemistry, Methods: This review synthesizes recent advances in AI-based WSI analysis for biomarker assessment in GC, focusing on molecular subtype prediction, actionable genetic alterations, immune-related features, tumor microenvironment characterization, and multimodal integration. Results: AI models have demonstrated promising performance in predicting microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus status, supporting their potential use as prescreening or triage tools to prioritize confirmatory testing. In addition, these approaches enable the quantitative characterization of the tumor microenvironment by mapping tertiary lymphoid structures and immune architecture, providing prognostic insights. Multimodal integration of histopathology with radiologic, genomic, and clinical data has shown improved predictive performance compared to single-modality approaches, particularly for recurrence and treatment responses. Discussion: However, challenges remain, including model interpretability, variability in performance across different datasets, and incomplete data across modalities. Future directions include prospective multicenter validation in clinical workflows, standardization of evaluation frameworks, and implementation of uncertainty estimation to support clinical decision-making. Overall, AI-enabled digital pathology represents a promising approach for advancing precision oncology in GC by improving biomarker assessment and providing insights into tumor biology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkerdigital pathologygastric carcinomamultimodal integrationprecision medicinewhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID42382396
PMCPMC13314436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.