ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Artificial intelligence for biomarker prediction in gastric cancer: from histopathology to multimodal integration.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) exhibits substantial molecular heterogeneity, necessitating precision oncology approaches. Conventional biomarker assessments, including immunohistochemistry, Methods: This review synthesizes recent advances in AI-based WSI analysis for biomarker assessment in GC, focusing on molecular subtype prediction, actionable genetic alterations, immune-related features, tumor microenvironment characterization, and multimodal integration. Results: AI models have demonstrated promising performance in predicting microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus status, supporting their potential use as prescreening or triage tools to prioritize confirmatory testing. In addition, these approaches enable the quantitative characterization of the tumor microenvironment by mapping tertiary lymphoid structures and immune architecture, providing prognostic insights. Multimodal integration of histopathology with radiologic, genomic, and clinical data has shown improved predictive performance compared to single-modality approaches, particularly for recurrence and treatment responses. Discussion: However, challenges remain, including model interpretability, variability in performance across different datasets, and incomplete data across modalities. Future directions include prospective multicenter validation in clinical workflows, standardization of evaluation frameworks, and implementation of uncertainty estimation to support clinical decision-making. Overall, AI-enabled digital pathology represents a promising approach for advancing precision oncology in GC by improving biomarker assessment and providing insights into tumor biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.