ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A deep learning-based prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating PET/CT imaging features.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to create and validate a prognostic prediction model that leverages deep features derived from PET/CT imaging to support personalized precision treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and pretreatment PET/CT data from 209 patients with DLBCL. Deep features were extracted from three-dimensional tumor lesions; after dimensionality reduction, a radiomics model was built to predict 3-year overall survival (OS). We evaluated six machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). The optimal radiomics model was integrated with clinical features to form a fusion model. The fusion model's performance was assessed on both training and independent test sets using metrics such as accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, the model's clinical utility was evaluated through Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, AB group, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, serum β2-microglobulin level, and maximum tumor diameter as independent risk factors for 3-year survival in DLBCL patients. Among the machine learning-based radiomics models, the LR model showed superior predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.865, AUC of 0.950, sensitivity of 0.875, and specificity of 0.863. Integration with clinical features further improved the model's performance. On the test set, the fusion model attained an accuracy of 0.921, an impressive AUC of 0.974, and sensitivities and specificities of 0.846 and 0.940, respectively. DCA revealed that this fusion model offers a significant clinical net benefit for prognostic risk prediction in DLBCL patients over a wide threshold probability range of 0.05-0.900. Conclusion: The fusion model, combining PET/CT deep features with clinical characteristics, is a dependable prognostic tool for DLBCL, holding substantial promise for clinical application and personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.