Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382376›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Retrospective Analysis of Inpatient Rehabilitation Consultation Referrals and Clinical Profiles in a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute (February 2022 to February 2026).

Abhimanyu Vasudeva, Tejas K Patel, Susmita Sarkar, Pratikshya Lenka, Nishat Ahmed Sheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhimanyu VasudevaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.
Tejas K PatelPharmacology and Therapeutics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.
Susmita SarkarProsthetics and Orthotics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.
Pratikshya LenkaProsthetics and Orthotics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.
Nishat Ahmed SheikhForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Rehabilitation is increasingly viewed as a vital part of comprehensive inpatient care, especially in large tertiary hospitals. Despite this growing recognition, there is still limited published information on how inpatient rehabilitation consultations are conducted in newly established tertiary care teaching hospitals in India. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to analyze temporal trends in inpatient rehabilitation consultations at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. The secondary objective was to describe the demographic characteristics of referred patients, the referring clinical departments, and the diagnostic categories prompting rehabilitation consultation. Methods A retrospective, observational, record-based study was conducted using inpatient rehabilitation consultation records maintained by the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at AIIMS Gorakhpur from February 2022 to February 2026. Data on referral trends, referring departments, patient demographics (age and sex), and primary diagnostic categories were extracted. Records were screened using predefined eligibility criteria, and duplicate and incomplete records were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Human Ethics Committee (IHEC/AIIMS-GKP/BMR/683/2026). Results A total of 1,025 inpatient rehabilitation consultations were included in the analysis. The number of consultations increased during the study period, rising from 61 in 2022 to 418 in 2025. The Department of Medicine was the leading source of referrals (52.3%), followed by Pulmonary Medicine (12.2%), Other departments (12.1%), Pediatrics (10.5%), Dermatology (6.6%), and the Department of Surgery (5.5%). The median age of referred patients was 60 years (IQR, 40-70), and 56.9% were male. Neurological conditions were the most frequent indication for rehabilitation consultation, accounting for 35.7% of all referrals. Conclusion The number of inpatient rehabilitation consultations increased during the study period. Most referrals originated from medical specialties and involved older adults with neurological or other complex medical conditions. These findings provide useful information for rehabilitation service planning, workforce development, and resource allocation in tertiary care teaching hospitals. The findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective single-center design and the inherent limitations of routinely collected clinical data.

Indexed as

inpatient consultationneurological disordersphysical medicine and rehabilitationreferral patternsrehabilitationretrospective studytertiary care

Identifiers

PMID42382376
PMCPMC13317413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.