ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
Differential Patterns of Social Attention and Memory Profiles in Depression: Evidence From Third-Person Social Interaction Processing.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential Patterns of Social Attention and Memory Profiles in Depression: Evidence From Third-Person Social Interaction Processing.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although social interaction is crucial for human social life, it poses unique challenges for individuals with depressive symptoms. From a third-person perspective, this study employed two cross-sectional experiments to investigate how depressive symptoms modulate whether the benefits of social interaction transfer to attention and memory functions, which constitute core processes underpinning successful interpersonal relationships and social engagement. A total of 72 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 72 demographically matched healthy control subjects (HCS) were recruited. Experiment 1 adopted a visual search (VS) task in which participants identified socially interactive or noninteractive individuals amid distractors. Experiment 2 included a working memory (WM) task focusing on interpersonal spatial distance and a long-term memory (LTM) task requiring the recollection of paired relationships. Compared to HCS, MDD patients exhibited preserved social attention benefits induced by social interactions, as evidenced by their higher search efficiency for socially interactive dyads. In contrast, MDD patients showed no evidence of either spatial compression effects induced by social intimacy in working memory or enhanced memory traces for interactive dyads in LTM. These findings suggest that individuals with depressive symptoms can benefit from social interactions to facilitate attention, but not memory functioning. Uncovering these differential patterns of attention and memory performance in social cognition challenges the traditional conceptualization of global social cognitive impairment in depression. The current findings also pave the way for targeted social memory training programs and interventions aimed at improving the quality of life in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.