Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Unveiling the unique gut microbial signatures in colorectal adenomas: establishment and validation of a cross-kingdom microbiome predictive model.

Bingfeng He, Zhiyong Xiao, Linfeng Zou, Jinmei Wei, Zhou Xiang, FangFang Sang, Xuefeng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bingfeng He *Wuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
Zhiyong Xiao *Wuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
Linfeng ZouWuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
Jinmei WeiWuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
Zhou XiangWuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
FangFang SangWuzhou Medical College, Wuzhou, China.
Xuefeng GuoDepartment of General Surgery (Endoscopic Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal adenoma (CA), the main precancerous lesion of colorectal cancer (CRC), originates in approximately 85-90% of CRC cases. With increasing demands for early diagnosis and treatment, gut microbiome research has become a forefront area. While numerous studies have shown that gut bacteria are closely related to the development of colorectal adenomas and cancer, research on viruses, archaea, and fungi is limited. Methods: From January 2019 to January 2024, this study collected 296 fecal samples from multiple centers and performed metagenomic analysis using shotgun sequencing. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted based on Bray-Curtis distance at the species level, α-diversity was calculated, and LEfSe analysis identified differential microorganisms. A random forest model was developed to distinguish adenoma patients from healthy individuals, with performance evaluated through internal validation using Bootstrap sampling and external validation with an independent cohort. Findings: Significant differences in the relative abundance of certain bacteria (e.g., Conclusion: This study shows significant cross-kingdom microbial signatures in colorectal adenoma patients, providing potential for developing new preventive and therapeutic methods. The predictive model, based on these differential microorganisms, exhibits robust and promising classification performance, offering potential for early adenoma detection.

Indexed as

colorectal adenomacross-kingdom microbiomegut microbiotametagenomepredictive model

Identifiers

PMID42382346
PMCPMC13314950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.