Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382327›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026

Prevalence of Cam Femoroacetabular Lesions in Medieval (1200-1600 CE) and Postmedieval (1600-1850 CE) Dutch Skeletal Collections.

Nouschka Bosch, Sarah Schrader, Daniel Cooperman, Randall T Loder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nouschka BoschFaculty of Archeology Leiden University Leiden Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7360-889X
Sarah SchraderFaculty of Archeology Leiden University Leiden Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-6748
Daniel CoopermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-2020
Randall T LoderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Riley Children's Hospital Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1217-0528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate medieval and postmedieval Dutch skeletal collections for signs of cam impingent. Methods: The medieval collections from Alkmaar Paardenmarkt and Klaaskinderkerke and the postmedieval period from Middenbeemster were studied. Standard osteological methods for sex and age estimation were used. From digital photographs of the femora, the apparent neck shaft angle, true neck shaft angle, angles of version and inclination, and the Results: The time spans were ~1448 to 1573 for Alkmaar Paardenmarkt, ~1286 to 1573 for Klaaskinderkerke, and 1615 to 1866 for Middenbeemster. Femora exhibiting signs of trauma, disease, or poor preservation were excluded. There were 116 individuals (186 femora) available for study: 21 individuals (35 femora) from Alkmaar Paardenmarkt, 38 individuals (52 femora) from Klaaskinderkerke, and 57 individuals (99 femora) from Middenbeemster. There were 104 male and 68 female femora (sex not known in 14). Using an Conclusions: Cam deformities that correlate with physical activity levels were found in historical Dutch skeletal specimens. Clinical Relevance: Cam deformity is considered an adaptive response to modern athletic activity. Evaluation of historical specimens will provide a fuller understanding of this condition by revealing whether cam deformity was present in historical skeletal specimens.

Identifiers

PMID42382327
PMCPMC13307327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.