ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2026
Safety and real-world effectiveness of eptacog beta with emicizumab prophylaxis: an interim analysis of the ATHN 16 study.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04647227 (Safety of SEVENFACT® for the Treatment of Bleeding Events in Patients With Hemophilia A or B With Inhibitors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety of SEVENFACT® for the Treatment of Bleeding Events in Patients With Hemophilia A or B With Inhibitors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eptacog beta, a recombinant factor VIIa bypassing agent, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in the management of bleeding events (BEs) in people with hemophilia and inhibitors. Data describing eptacog beta use in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis remains limited. This interim analysis of the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network 16 study, a phase 4, multicenter, US based, open-label study, evaluates the safety and real-world effectiveness of eptacog beta for the treatment of BEs experienced on emicizumab prophylaxis. Nineteen participants with hemophilia A and inhibitors who agreed to treat BEs with eptacog beta were included. Eptacog beta dosing was determined by the treating physician and participant. During the interim observational period, 9 of 19 participants (47%) experienced breakthrough BEs. Thirty-three BEs were treated using eptacog beta, with 1 participant contributing 18 BEs. Initial eptacog beta doses ranged from 56.8 to 245.1 μg/kg. A single eptacog beta dose was used to manage 66.7% of BEs. All events resolved without concomitant hemostatic medications. Bleeds treated with an initial eptacog beta dose ≥76 μg/kg had higher single-dose effectiveness and required fewer total doses than bleeds treated with an initial dose <76 μg/kg; differences were not statistically significant. Two participants were treated with eptacog beta perioperatively for 3 minor surgical procedures, and 1 participant was also treated with concomitant tranexamic acid. These observations demonstrate that eptacog beta was effectively used across a range of initial doses for bleed management and perioperative hemostasis by participants receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. No treatment-related adverse events, such as thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, or immune responses, were observed. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04647227.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.