ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Short-Term Preliminary Results of Outcomes with and without Tenonectomy During Open Conjunctival XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare outcomes of eyes with and without tenonectomy during ab externo open conjunctival (AEO) implantation of a gelatin stent (XEN45 Gel Stent [XGS]) with mitomycin C. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study of adults aged ≥40 with open-angle glaucoma and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) >17mmHg who underwent XGS AEO with or without tenonectomy at a single academic center (April 2021-September 2023). We matched eyes undergoing tenonectomy 1:3 to controls using nearest-neighbor algorithm. The primary outcome was success at 1 year (6 ≤ IOP ≤ 21mmHg, with ≥ 20% reduction from baseline, with or without IOP-lowering medication). Secondary outcomes included IOP, medication burden, visual acuity, and postoperative complications and interventions. Results: We included 40 eyes (38 patients): 10 with tenonectomy and 30 without. At 1 year, 70%, 60%, and 40% of tenonectomy eyes and 55%, 52%, and 36% of non-tenonectomy eyes achieved success at IOP thresholds of 21, 18, and 15 mmHg, respectively (all p>0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in IOP, medication burden, or visual acuity. At 1 year, mean IOP was 14.83 ± 2.08 on 1.13 ± 0.38 IOP-lowering medications in the tenonectomy group and 16.88 ± 1.53 on 1.36 ± 0.31 medications in the non-tenonectomy group. Tenonectomy eyes tended toward more early complications (30% vs 23%, p=0.69), but fewer postoperative interventions (30% vs 57%, p=0.28) and reoperations (20% vs 30%, p=0.70). Conclusion: Both techniques provided effective IOP control and reduced medication burden. In this short-term preliminary study, tenonectomy may be more effective than the traditional technique. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, findings should be interpreted cautiously. More data are needed to guide optimal surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.