ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Development of Reduced-Fat and Cholesterol-Free Mayonnaise by Chia Seed Mucilage and Whey Protein: Quality Parameters and Organoleptic Attributes.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mayonnaise is a popular condiment, but its consumption is concerning, especially for people suffering from high blood lipid levels and overweight. In this study, we aimed to formulate reduced-fat and cholesterol-free (without egg) mayonnaise samples with chia seed mucilage (0.5%-1%) and whey protein (5%-10%) similar to full-fat mayonnaise in organoleptic and technical properties. Interestingly, the light mayonnaise samples showed higher emulsion stability (98.91%-99.08% vs. 57.42%), viscosity (8185-9657 vs. 8610 cp), consistency (0.73 vs. 0.65), firmness (147.8-198.2 vs. 110), and adhesiveness (1991-2170 vs. 1850 mJ), with more than a 22% calorie reduction compared to the control. The higher viscosity, along with the increased moisture content (27.95%-29.56% vs. 15.21%), resulted in a better sensory score by the panelists (4.45-4.55 vs. 3.85), likely due to the perceived creaminess and freshness. The better rheology attributes were related to the electrostatic interactions in protein-polysaccharide complex which provide similar to or better texture than the control. The new formula showed lower brightness (due to higher light scattering), yellowness (due to lower oil content), and redness (due to egg yolk removal) compared to the control in the Hunter Lab assay. Interestingly, a lower peroxide value (3.3-3.74 vs. 5.86 meq O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.