ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Outpatient revision shoulder arthroplasty can Be safe and effective: a matched analysis.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outpatient Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in anesthesia, perioperative pain management, and clearer criteria based on pre-operative risk factors have enabled a shift of primary shoulder arthroplasty to the outpatient setting with acceptable complication rates. However, as the incidence of revision shoulder arthroplasty increases, the safety of outpatient revision shoulder arthroplasty and appropriate indications for same-day discharge remain less clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of outpatient revision shoulder arthroplasty and establish pre and intraoperative criteria for appropriate same-day discharge. Methods: All revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Outpatient revision shoulder arthroplasty with ≥3-month follow-up were matched 1:1 with inpatient revision shoulder arthroplasties. Outpatient status was defined as surgeries performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) or with admission times ≤24 hours. Surgeries were matched by components explanted and implanted, age, and gender. Demographic data, comorbidities, revision surgery subtype, implant details, major/minor complications, readmissions, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Results: A total of 38 surgeries (19 inpatient and 19 outpatient) were retrospectively analyzed. Outpatients (mean age 61.84 ± 7.78 years) included both ASC (n = 9) and hospital-based cases (n = 10). Hospital-based outpatients had longer surgical times (169 vs. 101 minutes; Conclusion: In this small, carefully selected cohort, outpatient revision shoulder arthroplasty can be safe and effective with complication profiles comparable to inpatient surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.